Suburbanestatesholopaw

Sectarianism in the Complutense antireligious, Nazism

The news has appeared on a shoestring. La Sexta, Cuatro, Telecinco and other teleprogres have not paid attention to it. What about newspapers? Silence. But the news is serious so you have the symptoms: A left wing group assails a chapel at the University stripping the altar. And I say symptom because no right-thinking on the left has come out in defense of a fundamental right: freedom of religion and worship. We can discuss whether or not to have a chapel at a university (I think there are many reasons for the existence, maintaining healthy secularism of the university), but once it exists, respect 'beliefs of those who employ them, requires all. We're talking about a fundamental right, the kind that likes izqueirda to defend both banners and shirts. Many say that is an excess, perhaps some young people are crazy have been exceeded, some like to say that I condemn s facts, but to be open a debate on the role of religion in the university (which will always be an excuse to prohibit it, of course) ... But none of these politicians will soon come out to defend the oppressed groups come out in defense of Christians (they do while they are murdered by the thousands in countries like India and Pakistan).

In fact, the rector Berzosa, known for his leftist sectarianism as one of the clan zeja has exhaled a press release without any advertising in the very mildly condemning the facts (to find it necessary to go in four or five clicks to it.) But remember that what is happening to Christians is not new, is the same method used with the Jews during the Nazi era : first be ridiculed and prevented from expressing (this phase is already underway) in public, then points them to ridicule from the rest of the population is directly make laws that make them non-persons and finally, when there are people with rights similar to those dogs or virus, kills them . "I exaggerate? Then give a tour of the television, series and news and see that I do not exaggerate anything. Catholics are the fools in the series, their ideas are to be condemned for not accepting the politically correct view with regard to sexuality (basically that any union between persons of any sex who are in the open-ended number and must be accepted) can not speak up because their ideas offend some very minority group (eye, the Church does not insult them or anything; simply does not share their way of life), the belief is expressed in the street or in the media is a clear sign of intolerance that should be eradicated, while those who have insulted them open bar. Which is also a Christian politician is clearly a right-wing fanatic and then I do not care what you say ... is discredited for speaking. This we

, not be surprised if one day we see fields extermination, or rehabilitation by the English geography . Is the phrase that heads this blog: first were ... and today many are silent.