What battle should give the PP? Alternatives to the disaster walk in the People's Party somewhat misplaced since José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero decided anunicar would not be the presidential candidate of the Government in 2012. And I say go up because it had based its entire strategy that Shoemaker was the sum of all evil without any good mixture. The criticism came to him and eventually just decided to imagine that Zapatero would not be that candidate and focus of their attacks in Rubalcaba, but what if it is Rubalcaba? PP tactics to win elections to be saying that ZP is very bad, it is, "and the arrival of PP
the Government will have power and make thaumaturgical Spain begins to run . It's a tactic that could be called the rotten apple
: when the fruit is ripe enough to fall for their corruption, we will collect. Zapatero will sink only without having to do anything. PP resignation to the battle of any kind, or ideas, or project, or propaganda ... anything, will not notice that we are about here.
PP Only a few leaders are willing to give a real battle for ideas: José María Aznar and Esperanza Aguirre
mostly. The latter is known for his phrase
mentioned I am not resigned to the fact that the supremacy of the ideas have left and if the right wants to win an election must be some left . José María Aznar has also decided to give a battle in that regard. Because the problem is not Zapatero, and indeed if he wins Chacon for instance, the socialist project would continue unabated, there would be too much difference. This is not a question of names and want the PSOE (it's been there the water to his land: enough to have a good candidate to win the election because the English people are idiots and vote at rates / as nice / as though they are harmful to the country or even lie ...), but of ideas, that is best for our country, society in which we live, for man as a whole. Because it is not we choose between a Catalan and
shoemaker named and woman, or a chemist and a socialist prodigious beard but who play in the other faction of the socialist homeland of all Hayek would say parties. No,
freedom and limited government is good for Spain and for the man while socialism was a ruin with Felipe Gonzalez, has been with Zapatero, Peron, Castro and Chavez, even with Schroeder has been a disaster. There is no one place where socialism can show a more advanced society, freer, more prosperous. Could it be that the problem is not the actors
but work itself, the libretto ?
That is to convince our fellow citizens, that freedom, regain control of their lives and their properties is better for them than the welfare state course to provide us with what we previously plundered from our pockets. That parents should have control over the education of our children, we can choose the model of health and education we want for ourselves and our own no matter the level of income and not be a one size fits all
while politicians and friends and family will American clinics to attend check-ups and more expensive schools for their children, while condemning their demagoguery to the poorest children to school without quality and without excellence.
The PP should give those battles, because otherwise, and we have said here several times, eventually stealing a snack
. Some are convinced that freedom, limited government, low taxes, etc. is much better than statism, totalitarianism gender and higher taxes to feed the Great Leviathan
State ... Why some give up this fight?
always 
